|
|
@@ -1,31 +1,22 @@
|
|
1
|
1
|
package se.citerus.dddsample.scenario;
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
-import junit.framework.TestCase;
|
|
4
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.application.ApplicationEvents;
|
|
5
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.application.BookingService;
|
|
6
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.application.CargoInspectionService;
|
|
7
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.application.HandlingEventService;
|
|
8
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.application.impl.BookingServiceImpl;
|
|
9
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.application.impl.CargoInspectionServiceImpl;
|
|
10
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.application.impl.HandlingEventServiceImpl;
|
|
|
3
|
+import static org.junit.Assert.*;
|
|
|
4
|
+import org.junit.Test;
|
|
11
|
5
|
import static se.citerus.dddsample.application.util.DateTestUtil.toDate;
|
|
12
|
6
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.cargo.*;
|
|
13
|
7
|
import static se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.cargo.RoutingStatus.*;
|
|
14
|
8
|
import static se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.cargo.TransportStatus.*;
|
|
15
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.handling.CannotCreateHandlingEventException;
|
|
|
9
|
+import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.handling.*;
|
|
16
|
10
|
import static se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.handling.HandlingEvent.Type.*;
|
|
17
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.handling.HandlingEventFactory;
|
|
18
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.handling.HandlingEventRepository;
|
|
19
|
11
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.location.Location;
|
|
20
|
12
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.location.LocationRepository;
|
|
21
|
13
|
import static se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.location.SampleLocations.*;
|
|
22
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.location.UnLocode;
|
|
23
|
14
|
import static se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.voyage.SampleVoyages.*;
|
|
|
15
|
+import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.voyage.Voyage;
|
|
24
|
16
|
import static se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.voyage.Voyage.NONE;
|
|
25
|
17
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.voyage.VoyageNumber;
|
|
26
|
18
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.model.voyage.VoyageRepository;
|
|
27
|
19
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.domain.service.RoutingService;
|
|
28
|
|
-import se.citerus.dddsample.infrastructure.messaging.stub.SynchronousApplicationEventsStub;
|
|
29
|
20
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.infrastructure.persistence.inmemory.CargoRepositoryInMem;
|
|
30
|
21
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.infrastructure.persistence.inmemory.HandlingEventRepositoryInMem;
|
|
31
|
22
|
import se.citerus.dddsample.infrastructure.persistence.inmemory.LocationRepositoryInMem;
|
|
|
@@ -35,44 +26,19 @@ import java.util.Arrays;
|
|
35
|
26
|
import java.util.Date;
|
|
36
|
27
|
import java.util.List;
|
|
37
|
28
|
|
|
38
|
|
-public class CargoLifecycleScenarioTest extends TestCase {
|
|
|
29
|
+public class CargoLifecycleScenarioTest {
|
|
39
|
30
|
|
|
40
|
31
|
/**
|
|
41
|
32
|
* Repository implementations are part of the infrastructure layer,
|
|
42
|
33
|
* which in this test is stubbed out by in-memory replacements.
|
|
43
|
34
|
*/
|
|
44
|
|
- HandlingEventRepository handlingEventRepository;
|
|
45
|
|
- CargoRepository cargoRepository;
|
|
46
|
|
- LocationRepository locationRepository;
|
|
47
|
|
- VoyageRepository voyageRepository;
|
|
|
35
|
+ HandlingEventRepository handlingEventRepository = new HandlingEventRepositoryInMem();
|
|
|
36
|
+ CargoRepository cargoRepository = new CargoRepositoryInMem();
|
|
|
37
|
+ LocationRepository locationRepository = new LocationRepositoryInMem();
|
|
|
38
|
+ VoyageRepository voyageRepository = new VoyageRepositoryInMem();
|
|
48
|
39
|
|
|
49
|
|
- /**
|
|
50
|
|
- * This interface is part of the application layer,
|
|
51
|
|
- * and defines a number of events that occur during
|
|
52
|
|
- * aplication execution. It is used for message-driving
|
|
53
|
|
- * and is implemented using JMS.
|
|
54
|
|
- *
|
|
55
|
|
- * In this test it is stubbed with synchronous calls.
|
|
56
|
|
- */
|
|
57
|
|
- ApplicationEvents applicationEvents;
|
|
58
|
|
-
|
|
59
|
|
- /**
|
|
60
|
|
- * These three components all belong to the application layer,
|
|
61
|
|
- * and map against use cases of the application. The "real"
|
|
62
|
|
- * implementations are used in this lifecycle test,
|
|
63
|
|
- * but wired with stubbed infrastructure.
|
|
64
|
|
- */
|
|
65
|
|
- BookingService bookingService;
|
|
66
|
|
- HandlingEventService handlingEventService;
|
|
67
|
|
- CargoInspectionService cargoInspectionService;
|
|
68
|
|
-
|
|
69
|
|
- /**
|
|
70
|
|
- * This factory is part of the handling aggregate and belongs to
|
|
71
|
|
- * the domain layer. Similar to the application layer components,
|
|
72
|
|
- * the "real" implementation is used here too,
|
|
73
|
|
- * wired with stubbed infrastructure.
|
|
74
|
|
- */
|
|
75
|
|
- HandlingEventFactory handlingEventFactory;
|
|
|
40
|
+ HandlingEventFactory handlingEventFactory = new HandlingEventFactory(cargoRepository, voyageRepository, locationRepository);
|
|
|
41
|
+ CargoFactory cargoFactory = new CargoFactory(cargoRepository, locationRepository);
|
|
76
|
42
|
|
|
77
|
43
|
/**
|
|
78
|
44
|
* This is a domain service interface, whose implementation
|
|
|
@@ -80,136 +46,212 @@ public class CargoLifecycleScenarioTest extends TestCase {
|
|
80
|
46
|
*
|
|
81
|
47
|
* It is stubbed in this test.
|
|
82
|
48
|
*/
|
|
83
|
|
- RoutingService routingService;
|
|
|
49
|
+ RoutingService routingService = new ScenarioStubRoutingService();
|
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
|
51
|
+ TrackingId trackingId;
|
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
|
53
|
+ /* The tracking id can be used to lookup the cargo in the repository.
|
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
|
55
|
+ Important: The cargo, and thus the domain model, is responsible for determining
|
|
|
56
|
+ the status of the cargo, whether it is on the right track or not and so on.
|
|
|
57
|
+ This is core domain logic.
|
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
|
59
|
+ Tracking the cargo basically amounts to presenting information extracted from
|
|
|
60
|
+ the cargo aggregate in a suitable way. */
|
|
|
61
|
+ /* Test setup: A cargo should be shipped from Hongkong to Stockholm,
|
|
|
62
|
+ and it should arrive in no more than two weeks. */
|
|
|
63
|
+ /* Use case 2: routing
|
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
|
65
|
+ A number of possible routes for this cargo is requested and may be
|
|
|
66
|
+ presented to the customer in some way for him/her to choose from.
|
|
|
67
|
+ Selection could be affected by things like price and time of delivery,
|
|
|
68
|
+ but this test simply uses an arbitrary selection to mimic that process.
|
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
|
70
|
+ The cargo is then assigned to the selected route, described by an itinerary. */
|
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
|
72
|
+ /*
|
|
|
73
|
+ Use case 3: handling
|
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
|
75
|
+ A handling event registration attempt will be formed from parsing
|
|
|
76
|
+ the data coming in as a handling report either via
|
|
|
77
|
+ the web service interface or as an uploaded CSV file.
|
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
|
79
|
+ The handling event factory tries to create a HandlingEvent from the attempt,
|
|
|
80
|
+ and if the factory decides that this is a plausible handling event, it is stored.
|
|
|
81
|
+ If the attempt is invalid, for example if no cargo exists for the specfied tracking id,
|
|
|
82
|
+ the attempt is rejected.
|
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
|
84
|
+ Handling begins: cargo is received in Hongkong.
|
|
|
85
|
+ */
|
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
|
87
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
88
|
+ public void cargoIsMisdirectedAndRerouted() throws Exception {
|
|
|
89
|
+ bookCargoFromHongkongToStockholm();
|
|
|
90
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterBooking();
|
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
|
93
|
+ // Initial route: Hongkong - New York - Chicago - Stockholm
|
|
|
94
|
+ routeCargoFromHongkongToStockholm();
|
|
|
95
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterRouting();
|
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
|
98
|
+ receiveInHongkong();
|
|
|
99
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterReceiveInHongkong();
|
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
|
101
|
+ loadInHongkong();
|
|
|
102
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterLoadInHongKong();
|
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
|
104
|
+ unloadInTokyo();
|
|
|
105
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterUnloadInTokyo();
|
|
84
|
106
|
|
|
85
|
|
- public void testCargoFromHongkongToStockholm() throws Exception {
|
|
86
|
|
- /* Test setup: A cargo should be shipped from Hongkong to Stockholm,
|
|
87
|
|
- and it should arrive in no more than two weeks. */
|
|
88
|
|
- Location origin = HONGKONG;
|
|
89
|
|
- Location destination = STOCKHOLM;
|
|
90
|
|
- Date arrivalDeadline = toDate("2009-03-18");
|
|
91
|
107
|
|
|
92
|
|
- /* Use case 1: booking
|
|
|
108
|
+ // Reroute: Tokyo - Hamburg - Stockholm
|
|
|
109
|
+ specifyNewRouteFromTokyoToStockholm();
|
|
|
110
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterNewRouteSpecified();
|
|
93
|
111
|
|
|
94
|
|
- A new cargo is booked, and the unique tracking id is assigned to the cargo. */
|
|
95
|
|
- TrackingId trackingId = bookingService.bookNewCargo(
|
|
96
|
|
- origin.unLocode(), destination.unLocode(), arrivalDeadline
|
|
97
|
|
- );
|
|
|
112
|
+ assignToNewRouteFromTokyoToStockholm();
|
|
|
113
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterAssignedToNewRoute();
|
|
98
|
114
|
|
|
99
|
|
- /* The tracking id can be used to lookup the cargo in the repository.
|
|
100
|
115
|
|
|
101
|
|
- Important: The cargo, and thus the domain model, is responsible for determining
|
|
102
|
|
- the status of the cargo, whether it is on the right track or not and so on.
|
|
103
|
|
- This is core domain logic.
|
|
|
116
|
+ loadInTokyo();
|
|
|
117
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterLoadInTokyo();
|
|
104
|
118
|
|
|
105
|
|
- Tracking the cargo basically amounts to presenting information extracted from
|
|
106
|
|
- the cargo aggregate in a suitable way. */
|
|
|
119
|
+ unloadInHamburg();
|
|
|
120
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterUnloadInHamburg();
|
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
|
122
|
+ loadInHamburg();
|
|
|
123
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterLoadInHamburg();
|
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
|
125
|
+ unloadInStockholm();
|
|
|
126
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterUnloadInStockholm();
|
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
|
128
|
+ claimInStockholm();
|
|
|
129
|
+ checkDeliveryAfterClaimInStockholm();
|
|
|
130
|
+ }
|
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
|
132
|
+ private void bookCargoFromHongkongToStockholm() {
|
|
|
133
|
+ Date arrivalDeadline = toDate("2009-03-18");
|
|
|
134
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoFactory.newCargo(HONGKONG.unLocode(), STOCKHOLM.unLocode(), arrivalDeadline);
|
|
|
135
|
+ cargoRepository.store(cargo);
|
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
|
137
|
+ trackingId = cargo.trackingId();
|
|
|
138
|
+ }
|
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
|
140
|
+ private void routeCargoFromHongkongToStockholm() {
|
|
107
|
141
|
Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
|
142
|
+ List<Itinerary> itineraries = routingService.fetchRoutesForSpecification(cargo.routeSpecification());
|
|
|
143
|
+ Itinerary itinerary = itineraries.get(0);
|
|
|
144
|
+ cargo.assignToRoute(itinerary);
|
|
|
145
|
+ cargoRepository.store(cargo);
|
|
|
146
|
+ }
|
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
|
148
|
+ public void checkDeliveryAfterBooking() throws Exception {
|
|
|
149
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
108
|
151
|
assertNotNull(cargo);
|
|
109
|
152
|
assertEquals(NOT_RECEIVED, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
110
|
153
|
assertEquals(NOT_ROUTED, cargo.delivery().routingStatus());
|
|
111
|
154
|
assertFalse(cargo.delivery().isMisdirected());
|
|
112
|
155
|
assertNull(cargo.delivery().estimatedTimeOfArrival());
|
|
113
|
156
|
assertNull(cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
157
|
+ }
|
|
114
|
158
|
|
|
115
|
|
- /* Use case 2: routing
|
|
116
|
|
-
|
|
117
|
|
- A number of possible routes for this cargo is requested and may be
|
|
118
|
|
- presented to the customer in some way for him/her to choose from.
|
|
119
|
|
- Selection could be affected by things like price and time of delivery,
|
|
120
|
|
- but this test simply uses an arbitrary selection to mimic that process.
|
|
121
|
|
-
|
|
122
|
|
- The cargo is then assigned to the selected route, described by an itinerary. */
|
|
123
|
|
- List<Itinerary> itineraries = bookingService.requestPossibleRoutesForCargo(trackingId);
|
|
124
|
|
- Itinerary itinerary = selectPreferedItinerary(itineraries);
|
|
125
|
|
- cargo.assignToRoute(itinerary);
|
|
|
159
|
+ public void checkDeliveryAfterRouting() throws Exception {
|
|
|
160
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
126
|
161
|
|
|
127
|
162
|
assertEquals(NOT_RECEIVED, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
128
|
163
|
assertEquals(ROUTED, cargo.delivery().routingStatus());
|
|
129
|
164
|
assertNotNull(cargo.delivery().estimatedTimeOfArrival());
|
|
130
|
165
|
assertEquals(new HandlingActivity(RECEIVE, HONGKONG), cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
166
|
+ }
|
|
131
|
167
|
|
|
132
|
|
- /*
|
|
133
|
|
- Use case 3: handling
|
|
134
|
|
-
|
|
135
|
|
- A handling event registration attempt will be formed from parsing
|
|
136
|
|
- the data coming in as a handling report either via
|
|
137
|
|
- the web service interface or as an uploaded CSV file.
|
|
138
|
|
-
|
|
139
|
|
- The handling event factory tries to create a HandlingEvent from the attempt,
|
|
140
|
|
- and if the factory decides that this is a plausible handling event, it is stored.
|
|
141
|
|
- If the attempt is invalid, for example if no cargo exists for the specfied tracking id,
|
|
142
|
|
- the attempt is rejected.
|
|
143
|
|
-
|
|
144
|
|
- Handling begins: cargo is received in Hongkong.
|
|
145
|
|
- */
|
|
146
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
147
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-01"), trackingId, null, HONGKONG.unLocode(), RECEIVE
|
|
148
|
|
- );
|
|
|
168
|
+ public void receiveInHongkong() throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
|
169
|
+ createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(toDate("2009-03-01"), null, HONGKONG, RECEIVE);
|
|
|
170
|
+ }
|
|
149
|
171
|
|
|
|
172
|
+ private void checkDeliveryAfterReceiveInHongkong() {
|
|
|
173
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
150
|
174
|
assertEquals(IN_PORT, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
151
|
175
|
assertEquals(HONGKONG, cargo.delivery().lastKnownLocation());
|
|
152
|
|
-
|
|
153
|
|
- // Next event: Load onto voyage CM003 in Hongkong
|
|
154
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
155
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-03"), trackingId, v100.voyageNumber(), HONGKONG.unLocode(), LOAD
|
|
156
|
|
- );
|
|
|
176
|
+ }
|
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
|
178
|
+ public void loadInHongkong() throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
|
179
|
+ createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(toDate("2009-03-03"), v100, HONGKONG, LOAD);
|
|
|
180
|
+ }
|
|
157
|
181
|
|
|
|
182
|
+ private void checkDeliveryAfterLoadInHongKong() {
|
|
158
|
183
|
// Check current state - should be ok
|
|
|
184
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
159
|
185
|
assertEquals(v100, cargo.delivery().currentVoyage());
|
|
160
|
186
|
assertEquals(HONGKONG, cargo.delivery().lastKnownLocation());
|
|
161
|
187
|
assertEquals(ONBOARD_CARRIER, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
162
|
188
|
assertFalse(cargo.delivery().isMisdirected());
|
|
163
|
189
|
assertEquals(new HandlingActivity(UNLOAD, NEWYORK, v100), cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
190
|
+ }
|
|
164
|
191
|
|
|
|
192
|
+ /*
|
|
|
193
|
+ Here's an attempt to register a handling event that's not valid
|
|
|
194
|
+ because there is no voyage with the specified voyage number,
|
|
|
195
|
+ and there's no location with the specified UN Locode either.
|
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
|
197
|
+ This attempt will be rejected and will not affect the cargo delivery in any way.
|
|
|
198
|
+ final VoyageNumber noSuchVoyageNumber = new VoyageNumber("XX000");
|
|
|
199
|
+ final UnLocode noSuchUnLocode = new UnLocode("ZZZZZ");
|
|
|
200
|
+ try {
|
|
|
201
|
+ handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
|
202
|
+ toDate("2009-03-05"), trackingId, noSuchVoyageNumber, noSuchUnLocode, LOAD
|
|
|
203
|
+ );
|
|
|
204
|
+ fail("Should not be able to register a handling event with invalid location and voyage");
|
|
|
205
|
+ } catch (CannotCreateHandlingEventException expected) {
|
|
|
206
|
+ }
|
|
|
207
|
+ */
|
|
165
|
208
|
|
|
166
|
|
- /*
|
|
167
|
|
- Here's an attempt to register a handling event that's not valid
|
|
168
|
|
- because there is no voyage with the specified voyage number,
|
|
169
|
|
- and there's no location with the specified UN Locode either.
|
|
170
|
|
-
|
|
171
|
|
- This attempt will be rejected and will not affect the cargo delivery in any way.
|
|
172
|
|
- */
|
|
173
|
|
- final VoyageNumber noSuchVoyageNumber = new VoyageNumber("XX000");
|
|
174
|
|
- final UnLocode noSuchUnLocode = new UnLocode("ZZZZZ");
|
|
175
|
|
- try {
|
|
176
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
177
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-05"), trackingId, noSuchVoyageNumber, noSuchUnLocode, LOAD
|
|
178
|
|
- );
|
|
179
|
|
- fail("Should not be able to register a handling event with invalid location and voyage");
|
|
180
|
|
- } catch (CannotCreateHandlingEventException expected) {
|
|
181
|
|
- }
|
|
182
|
|
-
|
|
183
|
|
-
|
|
|
209
|
+ public void unloadInTokyo() throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
184
|
210
|
// Cargo is now (incorrectly) unloaded in Tokyo
|
|
185
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
186
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-05"), trackingId, v100.voyageNumber(), TOKYO.unLocode(), UNLOAD
|
|
187
|
|
- );
|
|
|
211
|
+ createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(toDate("2009-03-05"), v100, TOKYO, UNLOAD);
|
|
|
212
|
+ }
|
|
188
|
213
|
|
|
|
214
|
+ private void checkDeliveryAfterUnloadInTokyo() {
|
|
|
215
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
189
|
216
|
// Check current state - cargo is misdirected!
|
|
190
|
217
|
assertEquals(NONE, cargo.delivery().currentVoyage());
|
|
191
|
218
|
assertEquals(TOKYO, cargo.delivery().lastKnownLocation());
|
|
192
|
219
|
assertEquals(IN_PORT, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
193
|
220
|
assertTrue(cargo.delivery().isMisdirected());
|
|
194
|
221
|
assertNull(cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
222
|
+ }
|
|
195
|
223
|
|
|
196
|
|
-
|
|
197
|
|
- // -- Cargo needs to be rerouted --
|
|
198
|
|
-
|
|
|
224
|
+ public void specifyNewRouteFromTokyoToStockholm() {
|
|
199
|
225
|
// TODO cleaner reroute from "earliest location from where the new route originates"
|
|
|
226
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
200
|
227
|
|
|
201
|
228
|
// Specify a new route, this time from Tokyo (where it was incorrectly unloaded) to Stockholm
|
|
202
|
|
- RouteSpecification fromTokyo = new RouteSpecification(TOKYO, STOCKHOLM, arrivalDeadline);
|
|
|
229
|
+ RouteSpecification fromTokyo = cargo.routeSpecification().withOrigin(TOKYO);
|
|
203
|
230
|
cargo.specifyNewRoute(fromTokyo);
|
|
|
231
|
+ cargoRepository.store(cargo);
|
|
|
232
|
+ }
|
|
|
233
|
+
|
|
|
234
|
+ public void checkDeliveryAfterNewRouteSpecified() {
|
|
|
235
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
204
|
236
|
|
|
205
|
237
|
// The old itinerary does not satisfy the new specification
|
|
206
|
238
|
assertEquals(MISROUTED, cargo.delivery().routingStatus());
|
|
207
|
239
|
assertNull(cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
240
|
+ }
|
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
|
242
|
+ public void assignToNewRouteFromTokyoToStockholm() {
|
|
|
243
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
208
|
244
|
|
|
209
|
245
|
// Repeat procedure of selecting one out of a number of possible routes satisfying the route spec
|
|
210
|
|
- List<Itinerary> newItineraries = bookingService.requestPossibleRoutesForCargo(cargo.trackingId());
|
|
211
|
|
- Itinerary newItinerary = selectPreferedItinerary(newItineraries);
|
|
|
246
|
+ List<Itinerary> newItineraries = routingService.fetchRoutesForSpecification(cargo.routeSpecification());
|
|
|
247
|
+ Itinerary newItinerary = newItineraries.get(0);
|
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
212
|
249
|
cargo.assignToRoute(newItinerary);
|
|
|
250
|
+ cargoRepository.store(cargo);
|
|
|
251
|
+ }
|
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
|
253
|
+ public void checkDeliveryAfterAssignedToNewRoute() {
|
|
|
254
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
213
|
255
|
|
|
214
|
256
|
// New itinerary should satisfy new route
|
|
215
|
257
|
assertEquals(ROUTED, cargo.delivery().routingStatus());
|
|
|
@@ -217,66 +259,71 @@ public class CargoLifecycleScenarioTest extends TestCase {
|
|
217
|
259
|
// TODO we can't handle the face that after a reroute, the cargo isn't misdirected anymore
|
|
218
|
260
|
//assertFalse(cargo.isMisdirected());
|
|
219
|
261
|
//assertEquals(new HandlingActivity(LOAD, TOKYO), cargo.nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
262
|
+ }
|
|
220
|
263
|
|
|
|
264
|
+ public void loadInTokyo() throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
|
265
|
+ createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(toDate("2009-03-08"), v300, TOKYO, LOAD);
|
|
|
266
|
+ }
|
|
221
|
267
|
|
|
222
|
|
- // -- Cargo has been rerouted, shipping continues --
|
|
223
|
|
-
|
|
224
|
|
-
|
|
225
|
|
- // Load in Tokyo
|
|
226
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
227
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-08"), trackingId, v300.voyageNumber(), TOKYO.unLocode(), LOAD
|
|
228
|
|
- );
|
|
229
|
|
-
|
|
|
268
|
+ private void checkDeliveryAfterLoadInTokyo() {
|
|
|
269
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
230
|
270
|
// Check current state - should be ok
|
|
231
|
271
|
assertEquals(v300, cargo.delivery().currentVoyage());
|
|
232
|
272
|
assertEquals(TOKYO, cargo.delivery().lastKnownLocation());
|
|
233
|
273
|
assertEquals(ONBOARD_CARRIER, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
234
|
274
|
assertFalse(cargo.delivery().isMisdirected());
|
|
235
|
275
|
assertEquals(new HandlingActivity(UNLOAD, HAMBURG, v300), cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
276
|
+ }
|
|
236
|
277
|
|
|
237
|
|
- // Unload in Hamburg
|
|
238
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
239
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-12"), trackingId, v300.voyageNumber(), HAMBURG.unLocode(), UNLOAD
|
|
240
|
|
- );
|
|
|
278
|
+ public void unloadInHamburg() throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
|
279
|
+ createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(toDate("2009-03-12"), v300, HAMBURG, UNLOAD);
|
|
|
280
|
+ }
|
|
241
|
281
|
|
|
|
282
|
+ private void checkDeliveryAfterUnloadInHamburg() {
|
|
|
283
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
242
|
284
|
// Check current state - should be ok
|
|
243
|
285
|
assertEquals(NONE, cargo.delivery().currentVoyage());
|
|
244
|
286
|
assertEquals(HAMBURG, cargo.delivery().lastKnownLocation());
|
|
245
|
287
|
assertEquals(IN_PORT, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
246
|
288
|
assertFalse(cargo.delivery().isMisdirected());
|
|
247
|
289
|
assertEquals(new HandlingActivity(LOAD, HAMBURG, v400), cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
290
|
+ }
|
|
248
|
291
|
|
|
|
292
|
+ public void loadInHamburg() throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
|
293
|
+ createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(toDate("2009-03-14"), v400, HAMBURG, LOAD);
|
|
|
294
|
+ }
|
|
249
|
295
|
|
|
250
|
|
- // Load in Hamburg
|
|
251
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
252
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-14"), trackingId, v400.voyageNumber(), HAMBURG.unLocode(), LOAD
|
|
253
|
|
- );
|
|
254
|
|
-
|
|
|
296
|
+ private void checkDeliveryAfterLoadInHamburg() {
|
|
|
297
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
255
|
298
|
// Check current state - should be ok
|
|
256
|
299
|
assertEquals(v400, cargo.delivery().currentVoyage());
|
|
257
|
300
|
assertEquals(HAMBURG, cargo.delivery().lastKnownLocation());
|
|
258
|
301
|
assertEquals(ONBOARD_CARRIER, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
259
|
302
|
assertFalse(cargo.delivery().isMisdirected());
|
|
260
|
303
|
assertEquals(new HandlingActivity(UNLOAD, STOCKHOLM, v400), cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
304
|
+ }
|
|
261
|
305
|
|
|
|
306
|
+ public void unloadInStockholm() throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
|
307
|
+ createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(toDate("2009-03-15"), v400, STOCKHOLM, UNLOAD);
|
|
|
308
|
+ }
|
|
262
|
309
|
|
|
263
|
|
- // Unload in Stockholm
|
|
264
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
265
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-15"), trackingId, v400.voyageNumber(), STOCKHOLM.unLocode(), UNLOAD
|
|
266
|
|
- );
|
|
267
|
|
-
|
|
|
310
|
+ private void checkDeliveryAfterUnloadInStockholm() {
|
|
|
311
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
268
|
312
|
// Check current state - should be ok
|
|
269
|
313
|
assertEquals(NONE, cargo.delivery().currentVoyage());
|
|
270
|
314
|
assertEquals(STOCKHOLM, cargo.delivery().lastKnownLocation());
|
|
271
|
315
|
assertEquals(IN_PORT, cargo.delivery().transportStatus());
|
|
272
|
316
|
assertFalse(cargo.delivery().isMisdirected());
|
|
273
|
317
|
assertEquals(new HandlingActivity(CLAIM, STOCKHOLM), cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
|
318
|
+ }
|
|
274
|
319
|
|
|
|
320
|
+ private void claimInStockholm() throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
275
|
321
|
// Finally, cargo is claimed in Stockholm. This ends the cargo lifecycle from our perspective.
|
|
276
|
|
- handlingEventService.registerHandlingEvent(
|
|
277
|
|
- toDate("2009-03-16"), trackingId, null, STOCKHOLM.unLocode(), CLAIM
|
|
278
|
|
- );
|
|
|
322
|
+ createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(toDate("2009-03-16"), null, STOCKHOLM, CLAIM);
|
|
|
323
|
+ }
|
|
279
|
324
|
|
|
|
325
|
+ private void checkDeliveryAfterClaimInStockholm() {
|
|
|
326
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
280
|
327
|
// Check current state - should be ok
|
|
281
|
328
|
assertEquals(NONE, cargo.delivery().currentVoyage());
|
|
282
|
329
|
assertEquals(STOCKHOLM, cargo.delivery().lastKnownLocation());
|
|
|
@@ -285,57 +332,43 @@ public class CargoLifecycleScenarioTest extends TestCase {
|
|
285
|
332
|
assertNull(cargo.delivery().nextExpectedActivity());
|
|
286
|
333
|
}
|
|
287
|
334
|
|
|
|
335
|
+ private void createHandlingEventAndUpdateAggregates(Date completionTime, Voyage voyage, Location location, HandlingEvent.Type type) throws CannotCreateHandlingEventException {
|
|
|
336
|
+ VoyageNumber voyageNumber = voyage != null ? voyage.voyageNumber() : null;
|
|
|
337
|
+ HandlingEvent handlingEvent = handlingEventFactory.createHandlingEvent(new Date(), completionTime, trackingId, voyageNumber, location.unLocode(), type);
|
|
|
338
|
+ handlingEventRepository.store(handlingEvent);
|
|
|
339
|
+ updateCargoAggregate();
|
|
|
340
|
+ }
|
|
288
|
341
|
|
|
289
|
|
- /*
|
|
290
|
|
- * Utility stubs below.
|
|
291
|
|
- */
|
|
292
|
|
-
|
|
293
|
|
- private Itinerary selectPreferedItinerary(List<Itinerary> itineraries) {
|
|
294
|
|
- return itineraries.get(0);
|
|
|
342
|
+ private void updateCargoAggregate() {
|
|
|
343
|
+ Cargo cargo = cargoRepository.find(trackingId);
|
|
|
344
|
+ HandlingHistory handlingHistory = handlingEventRepository.lookupHandlingHistoryOfCargo(cargo);
|
|
|
345
|
+ cargo.deriveDeliveryProgress(handlingHistory);
|
|
|
346
|
+ cargoRepository.store(cargo);
|
|
295
|
347
|
}
|
|
296
|
348
|
|
|
297
|
|
- protected void setUp() throws Exception {
|
|
298
|
|
- routingService = new RoutingService() {
|
|
299
|
|
- public List<Itinerary> fetchRoutesForSpecification(RouteSpecification routeSpecification) {
|
|
300
|
|
- if (routeSpecification.origin().equals(HONGKONG)) {
|
|
301
|
|
- // Hongkong - NYC - Chicago - Stockholm, initial routing
|
|
302
|
|
- return Arrays.asList(
|
|
303
|
|
- new Itinerary(Arrays.asList(
|
|
304
|
|
- new Leg(v100, HONGKONG, NEWYORK, toDate("2009-03-03"), toDate("2009-03-09")),
|
|
305
|
|
- new Leg(v200, NEWYORK, CHICAGO, toDate("2009-03-10"), toDate("2009-03-14")),
|
|
306
|
|
- new Leg(v200, CHICAGO, STOCKHOLM, toDate("2009-03-07"), toDate("2009-03-11"))
|
|
307
|
|
- ))
|
|
308
|
|
- );
|
|
309
|
|
- } else {
|
|
310
|
|
- // Tokyo - Hamburg - Stockholm, rerouting misdirected cargo from Tokyo
|
|
311
|
|
- return Arrays.asList(
|
|
312
|
|
- new Itinerary(Arrays.asList(
|
|
313
|
|
- new Leg(v300, TOKYO, HAMBURG, toDate("2009-03-08"), toDate("2009-03-12")),
|
|
314
|
|
- new Leg(v400, HAMBURG, STOCKHOLM, toDate("2009-03-14"), toDate("2009-03-15"))
|
|
315
|
|
- ))
|
|
316
|
|
- );
|
|
317
|
|
- }
|
|
|
349
|
+ private static class ScenarioStubRoutingService implements RoutingService {
|
|
|
350
|
+
|
|
|
351
|
+ public List<Itinerary> fetchRoutesForSpecification(RouteSpecification routeSpecification) {
|
|
|
352
|
+ if (routeSpecification.origin().equals(HONGKONG)) {
|
|
|
353
|
+ // Hongkong - NYC - Chicago - Stockholm, initial routing
|
|
|
354
|
+ return Arrays.asList(
|
|
|
355
|
+ new Itinerary(Arrays.asList(
|
|
|
356
|
+ new Leg(v100, HONGKONG, NEWYORK, toDate("2009-03-03"), toDate("2009-03-09")),
|
|
|
357
|
+ new Leg(v200, NEWYORK, CHICAGO, toDate("2009-03-10"), toDate("2009-03-14")),
|
|
|
358
|
+ new Leg(v200, CHICAGO, STOCKHOLM, toDate("2009-03-07"), toDate("2009-03-11"))
|
|
|
359
|
+ ))
|
|
|
360
|
+ );
|
|
|
361
|
+ } else {
|
|
|
362
|
+ // Tokyo - Hamburg - Stockholm, rerouting misdirected cargo from Tokyo
|
|
|
363
|
+ return Arrays.asList(
|
|
|
364
|
+ new Itinerary(Arrays.asList(
|
|
|
365
|
+ new Leg(v300, TOKYO, HAMBURG, toDate("2009-03-08"), toDate("2009-03-12")),
|
|
|
366
|
+ new Leg(v400, HAMBURG, STOCKHOLM, toDate("2009-03-14"), toDate("2009-03-15"))
|
|
|
367
|
+ ))
|
|
|
368
|
+ );
|
|
318
|
369
|
}
|
|
319
|
|
- };
|
|
320
|
|
-
|
|
321
|
|
-
|
|
322
|
|
- applicationEvents = new SynchronousApplicationEventsStub();
|
|
323
|
|
-
|
|
324
|
|
- // In-memory implementations of the repositories
|
|
325
|
|
- handlingEventRepository = new HandlingEventRepositoryInMem();
|
|
326
|
|
- cargoRepository = new CargoRepositoryInMem();
|
|
327
|
|
- locationRepository = new LocationRepositoryInMem();
|
|
328
|
|
- voyageRepository = new VoyageRepositoryInMem();
|
|
329
|
|
-
|
|
330
|
|
- // Actual factories and application services, wired with stubbed or in-memory infrastructure
|
|
331
|
|
- handlingEventFactory = new HandlingEventFactory(cargoRepository, voyageRepository, locationRepository);
|
|
332
|
|
-
|
|
333
|
|
- cargoInspectionService = new CargoInspectionServiceImpl(applicationEvents, cargoRepository, handlingEventRepository);
|
|
334
|
|
- handlingEventService = new HandlingEventServiceImpl(handlingEventRepository, applicationEvents, handlingEventFactory);
|
|
335
|
|
- bookingService = new BookingServiceImpl(cargoRepository, locationRepository, routingService);
|
|
|
370
|
+ }
|
|
336
|
371
|
|
|
337
|
|
- // Circular dependency when doing synchrounous calls
|
|
338
|
|
- ((SynchronousApplicationEventsStub) applicationEvents).setCargoInspectionService(cargoInspectionService);
|
|
339
|
372
|
}
|
|
340
|
373
|
|
|
341
|
374
|
}
|